About Concept B

Two concepts, two questions

Concept A asks: what if siviewpark.org stayed itself, but staff could run it? Same sections, same look, fixes in place.

Concept B asks: what if the site started from what visitors come to do? Six tasks on the first screen (swim, classes, events, parks, rentals, register), a Today panel, programs filtered by age, a parks map, and rentals filtered by group size. It keeps Si View's logo and green and tries a new typeface (Figtree, open licence) and a lighter, rounder layout.

The District doesn't have to pick one whole. The structure of B fits the look of A, and the price in our proposal is the same either way.

What it isn't

• Not the official Si View website. It's for the District's evaluation of our proposal, unlisted and marked so search engines won't index it. We'll take it down whenever the District asks.
• Not a rebrand. The District's brand standards (Q&A 11) come first in discovery; the typeface here is a suggestion to react to.
• Not the production platform. Both concepts run on Nanopage, a site platform Clearview is involved in building through our CTO, Jasmin Ihtijarevic. The production site is built on WordPress, or the option District staff choose with us in discovery, on the District's Exact Hosting account. Nothing in our proposal depends on Nanopage.
• Not new content. Every fact comes from the District's own pages. Where they disagree, a grey box shows the question. The interface wording (headings like "What are you up to this week?") is ours.

How it was made

Clearview built it from the District's published pages with AI-assisted development tools, disclosed in our proposal as the RFP's Q&A asks. Photos are the District's own. The map is drawn from U.S. Census Bureau TIGERweb data and the parks' addresses. Content was captured from siviewpark.org in October 2026 and may have changed since.

Questions, or to have it taken down

Chase Anderson, Clearview: chase@clearview.team, +1 (404) 660-8802 · clearview.team